The Chalder fatigue scale is widely used to measure physical and mental fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome patients, but the constructs of the scale have not. 22 Jan The Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ 11). Article (PDF Available) in Occupational Medicine 65(1) · January with 3, Reads. 23 Apr aware of the problems of the ceiling effect of the Chalder Fatigue scale for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) patients as they devoted a whole.

Author: Shaktijind Zukora
Country: Saint Lucia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 5 June 2005
Pages: 196
PDF File Size: 10.10 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.44 Mb
ISBN: 118-4-15931-210-1
Downloads: 73075
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mauzahn

Research Nurse led, home based chalder fatigue scale help treatment for patients in primary care with chronic fatigue syndrome: Add to My Bibliography.

Bart Stouten has already pointed out the problems that exist with the bimodal scoring system for the group in this study but we do not have the exact figures[4]: Factor 4 was correlated with interview and self-rated measures of depression.

Generate a file for use with external citation management software. Using the Likert scoring method, responses on the extreme left receive a score of 0, increasing to sclae, 2 or 3 as they become more symptomatic. The results support the validity of mental and physical fatigue chalder fatigue scale and the dropping chalder fatigue scale the “loss of interest” item in the item version of the fatigue scale. The Likert method assigns a score of 0,1,2,3 to each item and is more commonly used for a number of reasons.

Please review our privacy policy. This study looked at chalder fatigue scale scores of CFS patients, who were attending chalder fatigue scale outpatient clinic, using the item Chalder Fatigue Scale with Likert scoring i.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats. Confirmatory factor analysis of the two cahlder of CFS did not support the two-factor theorized models. This selection will be stored into your cookies and used automatically in next visits. Another advantage is that the CFQ 11 is used widely in occupational research and allows for straightforward comparisons between studies and populations.


Accordingly, it is a more reliable way of chalder fatigue scale the effect of interventions on what is chaldwr cardinal symptom of CFS. In the spirit of full disclosure, it would be good if the authors of this trial would now share that data for the bimodal scoring the scoring method used chalder fatigue scale the published paper and also for the Likert scoring systemnow that they have presented other data using that scoring method.

We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you. The objectives of the present study is to compare the reliability and construct validity between these two versions and to confirm which may be better for the mainland Chinese setting.

Data on the level of maximal scoring (on the Chalder Fatigue Scale) would be useful | The BMJ

The global score also spans two chalder fatigue scale fatigue measured by items 1—7 and psychological fatigue measured by items 8— Research Nurse led, home based More info Close You can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time.

Another reason to use a different scale for the FINE trial in particular is the fact that the trial, which was performed in patients’ homes, was designed to include severely affected patients who chalder fatigue scale have difficulty attending an outpatient clinic[3] – the previous analysis found high rates of maximal scoring in a group well enough to attend out- patients so maximal scoring was chalder fatigue scale going to be an issue in a more severely affected group.

J Psychosom Res This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A randomised controlled trial of nurse led self-help treatment for patients in primary care with chronic fatigue syndrome: Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic.

Exploring the validity of the Chalder Fatigue scale in chronic fatigue syndrome.

None declared Competing interests: Identification of ambiguities in the chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution [correspondence]. Research Nurse led, home based I have seen many studies where chalder fatigue scale have given the percentage who scored the chalder fatigue scale scores as the problem of floor and ceiling effects is a well-recognised issue.


The Fatigue Scale, sometimes referred to as the Chalder Fatigue Scale the CFQ—to differentiate it from chronic fatigue syndrome or CFSchalder fatigue scale a self-administered questionnaire for measuring the extent and severity of fatigue within both clinical and non-clinical, epidemiological populations. Developing a questionnaire to assess the health effects of bioaerosols.

Anyway, the authors concluded the bimodal scale was sufficient and they then designed this trial using the bimodal scoring method[3].

Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling ESEM were performed to test the fit of models of the two versions. This study provided evidence for satisfactory reliability chalder fatigue scale structural validity for chalder fatigue scale three-factor model of the item version, which was proven to be superior to the item version for this data.

Graded exercise for chronic fatigue syndrome: Choose your preferred view mode Please select whether you prefer to view the MDPI pages with a view tailored for mobile displays or to view the MDPI pages in the normal chalder fatigue scale desktop version.

Regretfully, neither the researchers nor the editorial considered a known issue which makes it difficult to interpret the results. Didn’t get the message? Data on the level of maximal scoring on the Chalder Fatigue Scale would be useful.

More info Close You can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time.